“My name is Robert and I’m an
addict.”
In the 10 plus
years that I have been clean and sober I have made that statement
about myself out loud hundreds of time before speaking about personal
experiences regarding substance abuse and recovery processes. That
one phrase is both introduction to a topic and a claim to authority
over the subject matter that follows.
It is also an expression of solidarity
with a group of people and their conception of a particular problem.
That always makes me cringe slightly.
So, what do I mean when I say I’m an
addict? Do I mean to say that I have a disease?
In 1987, the American Medical
Association proclaimed that drug dependencies including alcoholism
were diseases. Not based on biological evidence the proclamation was
an attempt to shift the burden of responsibility from the criminal
justice system to the heath-care system.
There are many people in academia and
outside of it who argue the various points on whether addiction is a
disease as if there were actually some a priori truth to be
discovered regarding how well the one theoretical construct matches
the other and if it really matters to an addict or alcoholic choosing
a life in recovery.
In the meantime, addicts are dying
every day.
I no longer find the debate compelling.
I am only interested in how an individual’s beliefs about his or
her use effects the chances for recovery.
When I was a teenager I used to steal
money from my father’s wallet while he took his morning shower. I
also stole money from my friends and their parents. I justified this
behavior by telling myself “I have an addiction to feed.” At that
time I thought I was biologically propelled to addiction and that my
behaviors were a result of some genetic misfortune. I exempted myself
from feelings of guilt on these grounds for years. I was also
excusing myself from any pressure to act toward changing the
addictive behaviors.
In addition to the AMA proclamation, I
think that part of the reason the disease model has permeated the
popular narrative on addictions is Alcoholics Anonymous, and a
misrepresentation thereof.
The first of the AA 12 steps states:
“we admitted we were powerless over alcohol – that our lives
had become unmanageable.” Many people in and around AA take
this very literally and disregard the fact that the next 11 steps all
detail a process of claiming power back from alcohol.
This is done by taking personal
inventory, making amends, and helping others do the same in order to
seek out a spiritual awakening.
A good friend once told me that
addiction is like an elevator going down, and that if we want to we
can get off at any floor.
I think the disease model isn’t
helpful if/when it is being use to explain away behaviors that can
be treated and extinguished. I think it is one explanation that
can offer comfort to families in pain, by why seek comfort when the
problem can be solved through action?
No comments:
Post a Comment